Friends & Lovers, Parrots & Waltzes
An Essay by Julie Bleha
Phoenix Theatre Ensemble's inaugural season continues with Plays in a
Pub, a program of two one-acts opening April 4th. The two plays, A
Perfect Analysis Given by a Parrot by Tennessee Williams and Can Can by
Romulus Linney, are significantly different but also speak to each
other in interesting and revealing ways. What unites them, more than
anything else, reflects PTE’s mission: the plays address a cultural
fundamental – the stories we tell and are told – in order to get
through our day or to give meaning to our life as a whole. In both
their genesis and execution, they ask, what are the stories that take
hold of us, that live with us, that demand we share them with others?
In the case of A Perfect Analysis…, Williams revisits characters he’d
created for another world in an earlier play; in Can Can, Linney
revisits a person and experience from his past, and uses these
recollections as the basis for a dramatic diptych of love stories.
Both plays look at the ties that bind us to each other – friendship and
love – while also exploring the underside of those glorious feelings –
separation or even rejection.
An obvious similarity between the two playwrights and their voices is
that both have been, throughout their careers, hailed as “Southern
writers.” Williams famously explored the pathologies of the Southern
family, while Linney’s reputation is staked, in part, on his retelling
of stories and reshaping of characters from his Appalachian roots.
Almost mandatory in any discussion on Southern writing is a reference
to the intensely rhythmic nature of the language; just because such
references come fast and furious, though, doesn’t mean they’re clichés.
In fact, both Williams and Linney’s works are exemplars of the wedding
of lyric quality with everyday speech.
Also paramount in the work of these two men is a sense of the power and
pull of time and memory; they show us characters who inhabit
simultaneous connections to past and present. In turn, we think of our
own past and wonder, what questions would we have answered, if we
could: will a passionate love last? will a friendship survive a frost?
later in life, when we recall pivotal events, will they be re-scripted
to accommodate nostalgic yearnings?
This question of reshaping is key to understanding Williams’ seemingly
light-hearted treatment of friendship that we see in A Perfect Analysis
Given by a Parrot. The play re-casts two characters from his 1949 play
The Rose Tattoo. In this work set in an immigrant Sicilian community
on the Gulf of Mexico, Williams introduces Anglo-Americans Flora and
Bessie, whom he refers to as clowns in the stage directions. As
characters, they are indeed grotesques of a sort, and they serve as
contrast in personality and sentiment to the play’s (by then)
distressed and despairing protagonist, Serafina. She is all emotion
and voluptuousness, even if she does her best to repress it at times
throughout the play; however, we’re meant to understand that her lust
is, ultimately, not shameful. Flora and Bessie, on the other hand, are
crass sexuality and loveless promiscuity personified, overlaid with
Anglo-Saxon moral superiority, and even a touch of gratuitous cruelty.
In The Rose Tattoo, Flora and Bessie do not come off as comely
characters, physically or otherwise. However.
Flora and Bessie stayed with Williams, and over the course of the
years, it must have occurred to him more than once that there was
another side to them, that perhaps these “two girls in the late
afternoon of their youth, which is close to forty” (as Parrot’s stage
directions introduce them) deserved another visit. Perhaps, like A
Streetcar Named Desire’s Blanche DuBois, Flora and Bessie are fighting
an unfair fight in this world, and they deserve another hearing.
Williams takes the two women, makes them Memphis natives, and brings
them to “the interior of a St. Louis tavern,” which is where we meet
them shortly after the curtain rises on Parrot.
The fun begins immediately; whereas Serafina’s costume suggested
sackcloth, and Blanche’s clutch and compact suggested the accoutrements
of a fading belle, Flora and Bessie have “cartwheel hats” that are so
huge that “when and if they want to look at each other, it is necessary
to tilt their heads far back.” The harshly named “clowns” of the
earlier play are now shown with loving (even slightly indulgent) humor.
To each other – at the play’s start, anyway – Flora and Bessie are in
perfect form, fashion-wise and friendship-wise.
It is the work of the play to explore, in a tight little framework,
the nature of that friendship. The two have a long history with each
other; the play’s title weaves a strand into the girls’ search for
meaning into that history. As Flora and Bessie go through their fond
memories of chasing the good times and the fun-loving boys at the
annual Sons of Mars conventions, they test what they mean to each
other, how they see themselves in relation to each other, and what the
strength of their friendship is. The “perfect analysis” of the title
refers to something Flora has learned from the eponymous parrot
(incidentally, another character holdover from The Rose Tattoo) which
she uses to parse the nature of her personality and relationship with
Bessie.
The play’s director, Jonathan Silverstein, knew the play and when he
heard that PTE was producing it, his eagerness to work with the company
and desire to do the play made him a perfect choice for helming the
production. Says Silverstein, “ the play speaks to me about how
friends treat one another,” adding that Flora and Bessie’s practice of
“savagely critiquing the other in the basest ways ([regarding] weight
and skin problems)” while waiting for some Sons of Mars to show up and
“entertain and distract” them, is a potentially horrifying act. But,
the director notes, because “all is forgotten when the men arrive,”
this made him “wonder why these women are friends in the first place.”
Silverstein names rehearsal as the process by which he hopes to
discover the answer to that question, adding “in the quest for this, I
think we will find the true humanity behind these women’s harsher
sides.”
Clearly, one of the challenges for the director lies in finding the
balance between the play’s savagery and tenderness, a tension
frequently excavated by Williams. Williams’s sympathy for the
slightly- or ill-used of our society, so clear in his rendition of
Blanche, lives on through the humor of A Perfect Analysis... Indeed,
Bessie says she does “her part to create some happiness in the world,
even if it’s just for one night,” adding that “it isn’t a crime to give
a good time and a pleasant memory, even to a stranger”; this could be
playwright, director and actor each staking a light-hearted claim for
their work as artists.
Williams produced a great number of short plays, and this play, like
the others, presents a challenge to the artists involved with it.
Unlike longer plays, which have the time and space in which to explore
details of a number of issues, short plays are, as Silverstein puts it,
“much more dense”; they demand that the artists “get to the heart of
the matter” much faster. However, the director feels that because
short “plays let us focus [on] smaller parts of a drama” they “often
can let us go deeper,” because “they generally only deal with one issue
or incident and enlarge on that.”
Romulus Linney also welcomes the compactness that comes with this form
of dramatic story-telling. He approvingly cites Edward Albee’s
statement that “there’s no such thing as a one-act,” suggesting that a
full story can be rendered with brevity. In fact, there are some
“things you can express in a short play that get thin in a long play,”
says Linney.
In a wonderful act of dramatic compression, Linney gives us in Can Can
two separate love stories that travel across time and geography, memory
and emotion. We meet a young American GI (the proverbial innocent
abroad?) and a young French woman; in the States, a young “country club
fool,” housewife-to-be happens to meet an older “homely and
countrified” woman. None of the characters are named (though Linney,
the ex-GI, dedicates the play to Mireille Bertrand, the closest we will
come to specific identities); but the particularity of their situations
is clear enough as we hear them all re-tell their stories, filtered by
time and distance.
In Can Can, PTE member Elise Stone notes, the stories share with us a
“joy of having known a kind of ‘love’.” In fact, it was this powerful
rendering of mood that drew the company to the piece. One of the main
questions reflected in the juxtaposition of the two love stories is, as
Linney rewords it, “in your life, how many times do you meet someone
who’s that important to you amorously?” The Young Woman tells the G.I.
“you are my first man… I picked you for that,” adding “as long as I
live, I will never forget you.” What does he feel when he hears such a
powerful statement? How will he remember that feeling in years to
come? The two couples, moving through courtship, entrancement, wonder,
love and finally parting, relate the lasting effect such encounters
have on them, and by extension, us.
Linney reports that Can Can was commissioned as one of six short plays
based on a piece of pop or classical music for a program called “Pops,”
and so he began with Offenbach’s famous “Can-Can.” Using music as the
starting point for a play is more than just an exercise: in Linney’s
case, music is a natural artistic parallel to writing. The lyricism of
Linney’s dialogue is highlighted by the play’s musical framework. The
compositions that begin and end the play (the latter being Offenbach’s
waltz “Orpheus in the Underworld”) are evocative in their own way.
Though there are undertones of longing and regret in what passes
between the characters, the fact that the play ends with what Linney
terms a “lovely little waltz” is a nod to the ultimate hope and joy
that are by-products of any encounter with love. Love – even its
residue – can be uplifting, even if it the person with whom we shared
the encounter no longer remains in our life. With this idea at the
root of Plays in a Pub, Phoenix Theatre Ensemble’s foray into the world
of these two works promise a lovely little evening of theatre.
Back to top
|